The technical proposal accounts for 40 to 60% of the final score. Doaken generates it from 5 data sources: analyzed tender documents, project references, team CVs, certifications and DTU/Eurocodes standards. What your teams spend 20 to 40 hours drafting manually.
Try with your tenderCriteria, weightings, spec requirements
Similar completed contracts
Skills and experience of team members
Qualibat, ISO, RGE, labels
Applicable technical regulations
Manual drafting ties up your teams for days on end. On a multi-lot tender, multiply that time by the number of lots. Compatible tenders are abandoned due to lack of capacity.
Copy-pasting between proposals produces responses that don't address the specific evaluation criteria of the tender. Your win rate stagnates.
CVs in emails, references in an Excel spreadsheet, certifications in a network folder. Gathering these sources takes as long as the drafting itself.
40 to 60% of the final score depends on the technical value of the proposal. Every point matters when competitors are also bidding.OECP, 2024Try with your tender
30 minutes instead of 20 to 40 hours. Your teams handle the tenders they used to abandon.
Every proposal is structured around the actual tender criteria, based on your references.
Your estimating managers focus on fieldwork, pricing and strategy.
Chapter structure, required documents, response format. No more risk of elimination for non-compliance.
See what a Doaken-generated proposal looks like:
See a technical proposal exampleA complete technical proposal in 30 minutes, structured around the tender criteria.
Try with your tender